Harari’s books all literally blew my mind. I listened just yesterday to a podcast on AI & the novel. It’s definitely becoming more and more relevant & pressing. Thank you for this thought-provoking essay!
I answered "no" to your question at the end but I've got to qualify that a little . . . I don't believe "we're all doomed" but I do think the supposed advantages of AI are drastically overhyped, especially in the fields of art, image, and text generation. Tasks which were are drudgery, like washing clothes or manufacturing textiles, were sensibly offloaded to robots, thereby affording a greater degree of human flourishing. But giving art to machines? Why is that a good idea?
I am confident, though, that artists will figure out a way to use these AI tools in the furtherance of their own art. I'm intrigued by the possibilities of using AI image generators as a means of randomization; this would fit nicely with the kinds of things the Surrealists were doing, mining their own dreams and using techniques like frottage or collage to "generate" imagery which they would then incorporate into their own artistic creations.
Thanks for your thoughtful response William. I'm interested in the way that artists are using AI in their work as a reflection of our world. It certainly does seem to have that uncanny element to it. Have you seen the work of Bennet Miller who produced AI-generated images of landscapes and children in sepia that were very surrealist.
This post situates this vision of a future of artificial intelligence (AI) within the context of art and as always, Victoria, you make us think more deeply about the human condition. AI only needs to gain a command of language in order to create havoc and it is already doing this with greater and greater efficiency. As Harari says in the YouTue video link you provide: 'For thousands of years humans have always been haunted by a much deeper fear; humans have always appreciated the power of stories and images and language to manipulate our minds and to create illusions' (22.00mins). The potential of this is truly frightening.
Yes I agree it is truly frightening, Yasmin, and like I said I have to stop myself from thinking about it because it doesn't feel like something ANYONE can control. There's no point in lobbying politically because it feels like it's beyond that. I am just hoping for the best, and trying not to expect the worst! Thank you for your kind words about my writing, appreciate that very much.
It was the BBC's Books & Author's podcast. Here's the link: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001ry44
Harari’s books all literally blew my mind. I listened just yesterday to a podcast on AI & the novel. It’s definitely becoming more and more relevant & pressing. Thank you for this thought-provoking essay!
Thanks, Lacy. What's the podcast? I'd like to listen
I answered "no" to your question at the end but I've got to qualify that a little . . . I don't believe "we're all doomed" but I do think the supposed advantages of AI are drastically overhyped, especially in the fields of art, image, and text generation. Tasks which were are drudgery, like washing clothes or manufacturing textiles, were sensibly offloaded to robots, thereby affording a greater degree of human flourishing. But giving art to machines? Why is that a good idea?
I am confident, though, that artists will figure out a way to use these AI tools in the furtherance of their own art. I'm intrigued by the possibilities of using AI image generators as a means of randomization; this would fit nicely with the kinds of things the Surrealists were doing, mining their own dreams and using techniques like frottage or collage to "generate" imagery which they would then incorporate into their own artistic creations.
Thanks for your thoughtful response William. I'm interested in the way that artists are using AI in their work as a reflection of our world. It certainly does seem to have that uncanny element to it. Have you seen the work of Bennet Miller who produced AI-generated images of landscapes and children in sepia that were very surrealist.
Will have to look into Miller's work; thanks for the tip.
This post situates this vision of a future of artificial intelligence (AI) within the context of art and as always, Victoria, you make us think more deeply about the human condition. AI only needs to gain a command of language in order to create havoc and it is already doing this with greater and greater efficiency. As Harari says in the YouTue video link you provide: 'For thousands of years humans have always been haunted by a much deeper fear; humans have always appreciated the power of stories and images and language to manipulate our minds and to create illusions' (22.00mins). The potential of this is truly frightening.
Yes I agree it is truly frightening, Yasmin, and like I said I have to stop myself from thinking about it because it doesn't feel like something ANYONE can control. There's no point in lobbying politically because it feels like it's beyond that. I am just hoping for the best, and trying not to expect the worst! Thank you for your kind words about my writing, appreciate that very much.
Thanks for your thoughts Shannon, and yes, I completely agree with all you say