Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jen's avatar

Ooh this post is so interesting! I have always struggled with Cezanne. Studying art history we learnt about his work forming the bridge between late 19th century blurry Impressionism and the early 20th century wacky weirdness of Cubism. And I honestly revere and respect him for this. But (brace yourselves) I have never actually liked his work and honestly don't know if I would have made it to the end of this vast exhibition! That said, I have never seen his painting of Scipio and it most likely would've stopped me in my tracks as it did for you Victoria. Loved hearing your thoughts on it and wish I could've walked through the exhibition by your side. It will happen one day! Right, now I'm off to look up Isaac Julien's "Lessons of the Hour" 😊

Expand full comment
Aric Cheston's avatar

This is so great. I don’t think I’ve ever read anything that place Cezanne in any context except an art-historical one. His work always seems to be presented as sui generis. But of course he was a person in a world as complex as ours and was inevitably influenced by it.

The Cezanne portraits show in New York a few years ago surfaced some really interesting works that I’d never seen before. And there wasn’t an orange among them.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts